Participating
Group Members:
Mark Anderson
Lisa Bailey
Richard Butler
Robin Culbertson
Jennifer Farr
Nancy Turner
Updated April 5, 2002
Contact
Webmaster
|
Possible
Solutions
|
Consequences
of Solutions
|
Advantages
(A) vs.
Disadvantages (D) of Solutions
|
|
Software
simulations in lab
|
·
Computers
availability in the lab
·
If
computers are not available in the lab then the software could be
loaded in student labs on campus
·
Software
simulations would allow students to repeat the simulation until
they had a greater understanding of the concept
·
If
computers are available are they adequate.
·
Site
license Fee availability
·
Students
knowledge of the program
|
A
Software
simulations would allow students to repeat the simulation until
they had a greater understanding of the concept
A
Provides
infinite variables in experiments.
A
Set
up and changes can be done quickly – efficient use of time.
A
Although
this may be an expensive undertaking, the long-range benefits may
be worth it.
A
Real-world
designers use software before investing in manufacturing
D
May
need to update computers
|
|
Begin
the course with easier, hypothetical experiments and them progress
to the time-consuming “real-world”
experiments.
|
·
Students
gain confidence, since they should be able to complete the early
experiments before the class ends.
As they become more familiar with the class and what she is
looking for, subsequent experiments should require more time.
·
Does
time permit this type of approach – personally, I think it is
the way the course should be taught I agree; it seems like
HERNANDEZ WANTS TO JUMP TO THE REALLY HARD STUFF.
·
All course requirements successfully accomplished
|
A
This
solution takes care of her problems of not having enough
“real-world” experiences.
A
This
may be a good way to combine the virtual experiments with “real
world” experiments. The initial experiments could be done on the
software and later ones could be hands on.
D
Real world designers use software before
investing in manufacturing
Return to Top
|
|
Fluid
Dynamic Software
http://www.eng-soft-
ware.com/
http://journal.fluid.power.
net/issue4/software4.
html
(This
is a better software program that an engineering friend of mine
found. It has a better, easier interface.)
|
·
Mid
term to long term solution – it may be implemented in a few
months +
·
High
initial cost
·
Requires
learning of software by IDC staff, and/or faculty, and/or graduate
students, and/or freshman students depending on how it would be
implemented
·
Students
loose hands-on benefits of conducting experiments
·
Lab
time can be used efficiently to demonstrate effects of variables
on experiments
·
Students
can complete the learning cycle within the lab timeframe –
hypothesis development, experiment, data collection, and analysis
of results
·
Extremely
flexible experiments can be conducted – changeable valves,
meters, etc.
·
Rapid
speed of changes in experimental apparatus
·
Large
scale experiments can be conducted
·
Computer availability and easy access
|
A
Students
can put more time into reinforcing activities and can use the
software to manipulate “virtual lab equipment”
A
Lab
time can be used efficiently to demonstrate effects of variables
on experiments
A
Students
can complete the learning cycle within the lab timeframe
A
Extremely
flexible experiments can be conducted – changeable valves,
meters, etc.
A
Rapid
speed of changes in experimental apparatus
A
Large
scale experiments can be conducted
A
Real-world
designers use software before investing in manufacturing
D
May
need to update computers
A
Still
can use real time labs after design here to test results
A
Flexibility
Return to Top
|
|
Smaller
class sizes
|
·
Additional
classrooms needed to accommodate smaller class size
·
Additional
teachers, materials, etc. to set up more classes
·
Limited
enrollment
|
A
More
individual attention
A
Students
waste less time
D
May
require another teacher
D
Additional
classes needed
A
Students
can be kept on task with better supervision
|
|
Have
Spaulding observe a class and lab
|
·
This
would help him understand what Hernandez wants
·
Scheduling
priority
·
This
would give Spaulding the chance to observe the students first hand
to see where the in-class the problem really exists. 1. Perhaps
Hernandez does not explain the lab set up well and the students’
experiment set up time is extended because of confusion on their
part. 2. Perhaps the materials are not well organized and the
process of gathering the experiment apparatus is time consuming.
3. Perhaps written supporting materials are lacking that give a
schematic of the experiment set-up.
|
A
This
would give Spaulding the chance to observe the students first hand
to see where the in-class the problem really is.
D
The
solution will be a semester away
Return to Top
|
|
Perhaps
the course is too encompassing and should be broken into more than
one course (example: Intro.
to Fluid Dynamics, Intro. to Electricity, Intro. to Force)
|
·
Students would be able to focus on one concept at
a time and would gain a greater understanding given more time and
less conceptual work to deal with.
|
D
More
courses means more teachers, more money
A
Students
build a stronger foundational understanding
D
The
above 2 components require very substantial restructuring of the
program, which is beyond the scope of Hernandez and Spaulding’s
work.
A
Include
with the prerequisite course
D
Back
to syllabus
|
|
Utilize
the graduate students, have them be group leaders and guide the
freshman in lab
|
·
Will
grad students maintain control of group
·
Will
skills be guided by grad students in a competent matter and
effectively?
·
Will
grad students provide grades or points for freshmen?
·
Will
grad students be compensated for extra time and responsibility?
Are grad students always compensated?
I think so.
·
Liability
insurance coverage for them? Will the university cover them?
·
This
provides leadership and organization within the group to more
efficiently accomplish learning goals. It also frees Hernandez to
strategically aid student groups who need help by moving from
group to group as needed.
|
A
Frees
up some time for Hernandez
A
Helps
keep students on task
A
More
efficient use of time for freshman and grad students
A
This
is a good alternative
D
Grad
student rotate in and out of the program – extra training
D
Grad
students would need to be compensated with credit or a stipend if
we require them to spend more time and take on more responsibility
D
Graduate
student overload, students may not get the problem solving part as
grad student already know answers
A
This
provides leadership and organization within the group to more
efficiently accomplish learning goals. It also frees Hernandez to
strategically aid student groups who need help by moving from
group to group as needed.
|
|
Hernandez
should talk to other faculty members who previously taught the
course (mentoring).
|
·
Maybe
someone else has a better way to teach the class. However, their
suggestions could be subjective.
·
Just
because they don’t like teaching it doesn’t mean they didn’t
do a good job.
·
Maybe
they don’t like the job because of the same obstacles faced by
Hernandez
·
They
may have some suggestions that Hernandez can implement
·
Hernandez
may have to change her teaching methods
·
This
would provide additional and objective perspectives on the
situation. As someone else mentioned earlier, both Spaulding and
Hernandez seem emotionally tied to previous methods of analyzing
the situation and hold some negative opinions that may need to be
reframed.
|
A
Hernandez
needs help!!! Perhaps they have some suggestions.
A
Possibility
of in getting the required time and cooperation of the other
faculty
A
Mentors
supply solutions that a new teacher might not even think
of/expertise and experience
A
However,
their suggestions could be subjective.
Return to Top
|
|
Spaulding
should meet privately with Hernandez in the lab so she can demonstrate
how she teaches students in real life setting/lab (without the
distraction of students)
|
·
Spaulding
may be able to provide insight and help to give Hernandez more
confidence and help her with time management.
·
Lab
availability
|
A
Spaulding
may be able to provide insight and help to give Hernandez more
confidence and help her with time management. (Same as my
suggestion – similar, but not exactly the same – I think
Robin’s is somewhat better)
D
It
is important to have Spaulding understand how Hernandez teaches
but I think it would be best for him to observe an actual
class.
D
Lab
time needed
|
|
Have
Hernandez and Spaulding consulted with the dept. chair?
|
·
Dept.
chair may lend insight to past class performance, expectations,
etc. provide suggestions for success
·
Hernandez
could be considered a poor candidate for tenure after one class
|
A
A
dept. chair should have a good handle on the coursework
A
Hernandez
and Spaulding need outside input
A
Added
experience!
|
|
Regarding
the lab equipment problem, a needs assessment of the laboratory
should be conducted.
|
·
It
seems as if Jake Spaulding has already done it (or at least made
an attempt).
·
What
were Spaulding’s findings? (On pgs. 126-7, he lists the key
elements of a fluid dynamics lab, per Hernandez’s
suggestions)
·
Spaulding
may not make correct assumptions; is he qualified or knowledgeable
enough to know what is needed?
|
D
Hernandez
may want more equipment than she really needs.
D
Spaulding
may not have the background knowledge to effectively perform a
needs assessment, should be done by the department chair?
D
This
may be fundamental problem. Spaulding could enlist the help of
faculty in the needs assessment.
D
Inventory
must be updated to identify materials needed to complete labs.
|
|
Give
Spaulding a brief summary of fluid dynamics (and the other areas
of study)
|
·
At
least he’ll have some idea of what she is talking about
·
Additional
engineering faculty may be of benefit in this process as well. (A
tie in with the next solution of mentoring)
|
A
At
least he’ll have some idea of what she is talking about
D
Fluid
dynamics is only one unit of the course
D
He
needs a better background knowledge to effectively design the
courseware
|
|
Have
Hernandez explore other methods of teaching
.
|
·
Maybe
the grad students have an innovative way to teach the material.
Presumably Hernandez has more experience.
Hernandez needs to be open to suggestions and not just
think her way is right. Agreed.
·
Find
time to observe other professors – This is an excellent means of
obtaining ideas for brainstorming new approaches. Both Hernandez
and Spaulding should observe other professors.
Great idea, but timing may be bad.
This should have been done during the break, after her
“disaster” semester.
|
A
Great
way to get new ideas.
D
Any
teacher young/old can benefit from learning new methods of
teaching, but let’s keep in mind Spaulding does not have a lot
of educational background
A
Others
may meet the course objectives, less time consuming teaching
methods.
D
Time
is the biggest disadvantage
D
Great
idea, but timing may be bad.
This should have been done during the break, after her
“disaster” semester.
Return to Top
|
|
Perhaps
Spaulding could present the problem to other designers in the
group – consulting with each other regarding various cases would
seem natural given the number of designers on staff and the
individual strengths each brings to the team.
|
·
Each
member could bring his/her particular strength into creating an
effective and workable plan
·
Meetings
take time
|
D
Spaulding
is not a team player
D
If
Spaulding is not a team player he should probably look for a new
job
D
Spaulding
needs outside input
A
Added
experience!
D
Consulting
may lead to “too many chefs in the kitchen”
|
|
Have
lab assistants set up experiments ahead of time
.
|
·
This
would help with the time frame but would not allow the students to
learn to do it themselves
·
Availability
of lab assistants
·
Available
funds to pay lab assistants for extra duties/time
·
Would
have to train the assistants, more time involved.
|
A
This
would help with the time frame
D
Large
turnover rate – training the lab assistants would be necessary
on a regular basis
D
Stipend/credit
issues would need to be resolved – doubtful that graduates would
take on extra duties for free
A
It
will help students complete the rest of the experiment but the
above issues would need to be addressed
|
|
Provide
more lab time and resources
|
·
Room
availability
·
Who
will supervise the lab during this time
·
Additional
costs for supervision, maintenance of the lab while open
·
Possible
additional costs for resources: software, experiment
|
A
Divides
some of the material for the course
A
Makes
the course more manageable
A
Gives
additional time for real world experiences, hands-on activities,
experiments
D
Student’s
will not be less motivated with a longer class
D
Money,
time, space, personnel
|
|
Review
the course syllabus
|
·
The
course syllabus should be established prior to this course being
offered. If it isn’t, or isn’t up to date, then this would be
a very important piece for Spaulding to focus on
·
Students
and staff need to be aware of the objectives of the course/staff
needs to be held accountable for set up of syllabus
|
D
Analyze
the syllabus
D
Spaulding
should use the syllabus as a foundational piece of his research
D
Objective
of class must be made available to student and teacher
D
The
syllabus needs to be established, if not already, but I don’t
see this as a solution
|
|
Have
graduate students set up and conduct experiments using different
materials and configurations as described in examples. Videotape
the experiments to present to students. The initial experiment
configuration can be shown along with outcome and then students
can be asked how they expect different elements to change the
outcome. The actual experiment results can then be shown. This can
also be expanded to show how the factors of fluid dynamics operate
in actual real world situations by videotaping in the field. For
example, the graduate students could tape footage at a water
treatment plant and show how changes in valves, pumps, tanks, etc.
effect fluid dynamics or footage at an airport could show how
temperature effects fuel flow by showing gauges readings at
different ambient temperatures.
|
·
Mid
term solution – it may be implemented within a few weeks to
months
·
Requires
coordination between IDC staff and graduate students
·
Students
lose hands-on benefits of conducting experiments
·
Lab
time can be used efficiently to demonstrate effects of variables
on experiments
·
Students
can complete the learning cycle within the lab timeframe –
hypothesis development, experiment, data collection, and analysis
of results
·
Students
can see how knowledge obtained from experiments can be applied to
real world engineering situations
·
Flexible
experiments can be conducted – changeable valves, meters, etc.
·
Large
scale experiments can be conducted
|
D
Students
wouldn’t have the benefit of learning how to set up experiments
on their own.
D
More
responsibility dictates more money or grad. Credit for graduate
students.
A
Flexible
experiments can be conducted – changeable valves, meters, etc.
A
Large
scale experiments can be conducted
A
Students
can see real world applicability
D
Students
won’t be motivated
D
Graduate
students are overloaded
Return to Top
|
|
Demonstrations
of correct techniques (of what?) prior to students attempting the
lab
|
·
Demonstration
requires setup time. Who will do the demonstration – Hernandez
or grad students? My!!
·
Hernandez
needs to demonstrate procedures/More time needed to demonstrate
·
Less
student-oriented
|
D
TIME,
TIME, TIME
D
Less
student-driven
D
More
accurate results
|
|
Leave
set up intact, set up may not be needed
|
·
May not be possible or practical to leave room
intact
|
D
Part
of the learning experience is the set-up
D
Impractical
use of lab space
D
In
her 3 problems, set up not important to solving the problem
D
This
eliminates a lot of time spent by the students, but it is unknown
whether the equipment can be left up between classes.
|
|
Team
teaching or one teacher teaching lab another handling lecture
|
·
Hernandez
will no tgo for this. She
seems to want to do it herself, her way is best
·
Additional
teachers may not be available-additional teachers mean additional
costs and scheduling. In
addition, no one else wants to teach the course.
·
Team
teaching could be a successful solution; one teacher could be
teaching while the other supervised grad. Students in adjoining
area for hands on follow-up
·
Problem
starting this at this point, scheduling nightmare
|
D
Who
is she going to get to help teach? No one wants to do this class
D
Maybe
other teachers didn’t like the course because it was too much
for one teacher to handle well.
A
It
is common in science courses for one teacher to lecture and
another to teach the lab
D
Do
teachers have the right to refuse if they are told to team-teach
or split the course?
D
Although
this may be an excellent way to conduct the class, may not solve
the students’ time constraint problem.
D
Hard
to get another teacher available
D
Money
would be a problem possibly
A
Maybe
this could be worked in with the prerequisite class
|
|
Freshmen
scores should be analyzed – is there a vast difference between
Hernandez student scores and previous professor student scores?
–
|
·
If
the scores are distinctly different than past scores, then
Hernandez is right in seeking help, but the focus of the help may
need to be on her personal teaching skills, classroom management
skills, and perhaps training in time management.
·
If
the scores are the same as they have been in past years then
decisions need to be made as to whether to change the format of
the course.
|
D
Can
comparisons be made after teaching just one class?
A
Tracking
past performance helps gauge whether the problem is the students
or the teacher
A
Include
with the prerequisite course.
D
Have
a lower level course available
Return to Top
|
|
Video
to supplement lecture activities
|
·
Students
could use video for reinforcement of concepts later
·
Must
have someone to video and edit
·
Will
need to have the equipment
·
Equipment
set up
·
Time
to watch the video
|
D
Videos
can be very boring
A
Hopefully,
the IDC would have the expertise to create interesting videos.
A
Students
can borrow videos to review and focus on concepts – may be good
for students who have trouble focusing in lecture hall
D
I
think the software would be much more beneficial here especially
if money is an issue
D
Students
don’t like videos/boring
|
|
Labs
could work in tandem to complete hands on experiments. The case
study states there are 8 sections. They could alternate which lab
sets up and which lab conducts the experiment.
|
·
Short
term solution – It may be implemented immediately
·
Graduate
students would be required to set up labs every other morning
·
Fewer
experiments could be conducted throughout the semester
·
Students
would have time to complete assigned experiments
·
No
additional cost or requirement of effort other than graduate
students setting up labs
·
Simple
to implement
·
Lab
availability and room
|
A
Fewer
experiments could be conducted throughout the semester
D
Complicated
D
Students
aren’t getting hands-on experiences
A
Cuts
down on setup time
D
Setup
not important; the manipulating of the set up is
Return to Top
|
|
On
the first day of class, give the students a “pop quiz” that
covers the basic principles needed for the course.
Those students who score poorly on the quiz may need to
take another (not necessarily remedial) course PRIOR to this
course.
|
·
Who
will teach such a course; additional costs come with adding
courses? If the course is broken into two separate components
(e.g. lecture & lab), Hernandez could teach the lecture(s) and
the GTAs teach the labs.
·
Add
to curriculum
|
D
This
evaluation would need to be done prior to the course.
D
The
prerequisite course could cover this
D
Students
unprepared could drop
D
This
may take care of the over-populated class problem.
|
|
Have
graduate student do the lab and write specific lab instructions to
be followed.
|
·
Do
graduate students have the expertise to write the directions?
·
Graduate
students need to be proficient at conducting the lab
·
This
provides guidance that helps solve what may be a significant
problem in the course.
·
Freshmen
lose the “hands-on” experience
|
A
This
would free up Hernandez
A
D
Places
graduate student in teacher role
A
A
This
provides guidance that helps solve what may be a significant
problem in the course
D
More
work for the graduate student
D
Less
student-driven
|
|
Graduate
students could hold study sessions with students or be paid to
tutor students who were struggling
|
·
One
on one tutoring could help students experience greater success
·
Tutoring
costs
|
D
This
is a good idea but does not solve time constraint problem.
D
Additional
time involved
D
Is
this to be monitored by Hernandez?
D
Should
be voluntary
|
|
Return to Top
|
|